<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horn Bagles</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 20:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: egw</title>
		<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[egw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfield.com/blog/?p=63#comment-229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Ya, I&#039;m not so excited about the video (after all the current generation ipod does video fine as far as I&#039;m concerned) as I am about the supposed 4-inch screen (the entire face is supposed to be one large screen!) and soft click-wheel.  Now if only they make it wireless too, I&#039;d be all set.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, I&#8217;m not so excited about the video (after all the current generation ipod does video fine as far as I&#8217;m concerned) as I am about the supposed 4-inch screen (the entire face is supposed to be one large screen!) and soft click-wheel.  Now if only they make it wireless too, I&#8217;d be all set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon_a_thon</title>
		<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jon_a_thon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfield.com/blog/?p=63#comment-228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think the hand rotoscoping (though I&#039;m sure it was computer assisted) looked a little more organic than the flash stuff.  I thought it looked pretty good.  Did it add to the film?  I don&#039;t think it was necessary.  It added a level of abstraction is all, made it a little more dreamy and less concrete.  It probably would have worked about as well without.  I think my friend (who had read the book) found it a little distracting because she was expecting it to look grittier.  But in the end I found it to be a worthwhile piece of art as it was.  But I guess I almost always do :)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the hand rotoscoping (though I&#8217;m sure it was computer assisted) looked a little more organic than the flash stuff.  I thought it looked pretty good.  Did it add to the film?  I don&#8217;t think it was necessary.  It added a level of abstraction is all, made it a little more dreamy and less concrete.  It probably would have worked about as well without.  I think my friend (who had read the book) found it a little distracting because she was expecting it to look grittier.  But in the end I found it to be a worthwhile piece of art as it was.  But I guess I almost always do <img src="https://jonathanfield.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon_a_thon</title>
		<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jon_a_thon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfield.com/blog/?p=63#comment-227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Heh, yeah, I imagine it&#039;s pretty close to EOL.  Glad to help clear out their inventory.  I hadn&#039;t thought much about that, but good thing I&#039;m not particularly interested in the video features!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, yeah, I imagine it&#8217;s pretty close to EOL.  Glad to help clear out their inventory.  I hadn&#8217;t thought much about that, but good thing I&#8217;m not particularly interested in the video features!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: langure</title>
		<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[langure]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfield.com/blog/?p=63#comment-226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t get the rotoscoping* thing.  I mean, I heard that they threw in some pure animated stuff but they basically just filmed the thing and then drew over the frames.  Now I haven&#039;t seen it, (didn&#039;t like Waking Life and don&#039;t care for Keanu), and don&#039;t plan on it so I ask you, did the animation add anything worth while beyond the film it was painted on?  Would it have worked the same had they not rotoscoped it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*and since you can rotoscope with computer programs these days (ex. Flash) I have to wonder what they did for rotoscoping that was worth it.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the rotoscoping* thing.  I mean, I heard that they threw in some pure animated stuff but they basically just filmed the thing and then drew over the frames.  Now I haven&#8217;t seen it, (didn&#8217;t like Waking Life and don&#8217;t care for Keanu), and don&#8217;t plan on it so I ask you, did the animation add anything worth while beyond the film it was painted on?  Would it have worked the same had they not rotoscoped it?</p>
<p>*and since you can rotoscope with computer programs these days (ex. Flash) I have to wonder what they did for rotoscoping that was worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egw</title>
		<link>https://jonathanfield.com/blog/2006/07/horn-bagles/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[egw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanfield.com/blog/?p=63#comment-225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks for getting an ipod!  I assume that means the next generation (the infamous &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0602videoipod.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;true video&#039;ipod&lt;/a&gt;) will be coming out very soon. ;)&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for getting an ipod!  I assume that means the next generation (the infamous <a href='http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0602videoipod.html' rel="nofollow">&#8216;true video&#8217;ipod</a>) will be coming out very soon. <img src="https://jonathanfield.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
